It all started late last summer (2017) and in reality all of this began several years ago. I am referring to a potential bobcat season here in Indiana. For those of you from out of state, please read further. The "big picture" of this applies to all of us who care about conservation, wildlife management, trapping and hunting rights. As bobcat sightings increased, incidental catches increased, road-kills increased and trail cam pictures increased- the common question was "when are we going to have a bobcat season?" Here at Hoosier Trapper Supply it was pretty rare for a day to go by without hearing about someone's encounter with a bobcat. I have to say, I was pretty excited. In my younger years I never dreamed that we would even have a discussion about a bobcat season in my home state. For some related history, Indiana worked through and received an otter season which started in 2015. It is a strictly regulated season, applies only to certain counties, and has a quota. Quite frankly, the process for obtaining the otter season came off without much of a hitch. There was some public opposition however, it was fairly insignificant. The process in Indiana, initially the proposed season is preliminary adopted by the Natural Resource Commission. From that point the proposal is opened up for public comment. The public can comment both on-line and at public comment hearings. Last October (2017) I attended the Natural Resource Commission meeting where the proposal was up for a vote to either stop or move forward the idea of a season. The bobcat season was in a package of a number of proposed rule changes. The bobcat season along with a rule to require nuisance trappers to euthanize raccoons, opossums and coyotes (instead of releasing them) were the two changes that were significant. Bottom line, the Natural Resource Commission voted to preliminary adopt the rule package. This was despite a very lopsided group of attendees. Three of us spoke in favor of the season and 16 spoke against. To me, the opposition to this was the first wake up call. I overheard one individual opposed to the season say "We are just getting started". Over the next 6 months on-line comments were accepted and 2 public hearings were held. Trappers were encouraged to make a comment on-line and to attend hearings. The first public hearing was in Southern Indiana in a county that would be included in the season. The meeting was well attended. Those in favor of the season were 60% plus and those opposed were 35% plus or minus. At this point I felt pretty good about our position and support. The second and last public hearing was held in the Northern Indiana. All I can say is that a geographical change made a huge difference. The area was much closer to Indianapolis and several mostly urban counties. The proposed counties for the season were all in the southern half of the state. The hearing was in the northern half of the state. To make a long story short; 70 people spoke in opposition to the season and only 10 of us spoke in favor. I must admit it was a miserable 3 hours to sit through. The opposition brought up everything from how many ticks opossums eat to the white rhino going extinct. We were just out-matched. Certainly, the opposition which included the Humane Society of the United States and the Sierra Club was much more organized than we were and did a better job in rallying the troops. Even though, what they said was half truths at best and in most cases just plan "made up" rhetoric. The Natural Resource Commission met in May (2018) for a final vote on the proposed rule changes. The room slowly filled up and by the time the meeting started there wasn't a chair available. It was evident that those of us in favor of a season were in the minority. To say it wasn't even close would be an understatement! Here again, the opposition did a much better job. The meeting agenda was adjusted so that the bobcat season, mandatory euthanasia proposals, and the other DNR rule changes would be addressed first. To sum this up, the DNR pulled the bobcat season and the mandatory euthanasia proposals from the rule change package. The Natural Resource Commission voted in favor of the rest of the package. No Bobcat Season on the immediate horizon! Some may say (and I agree) biology and the recommendation of a biologist were ignored in favor of an unknowing, emotionally charged group that would oppose any consumptive use of wildlife. Some have speculated that the opposition came from out of state. Although, some of the on-line opposition did come from out of state, it was noted appropriately and the vast majority of the opposition came from within Indiana. It would be naïve to say politics aren't involved as well. I also would say, what is the point of public input if it was just ignored? Online comments were very lopsided with a ratio of 10 - 1 in favor of those opposed to the season. Online response was much greater than the number of attendees at the 2 public hearings. We can speculate with conspiracy theories, make excuses, pass-blame or we can accept responsibility and admit that we were just outnumbered and out maneuvered. Some may say "I'm not in an area that will be a part of the season, I just don't care and I don't need to be involved" My response to that is this is a gain for all of us whether you personally can take advantage of the season or not. To have a bobcat season is an offensive gain. Trappers are a minority and we have the largest target on our backs in respect to all of the animal rights groups. Many states continually fight the efforts of these groups. So we have to remember, even if it doesn't affect us directly we have to be pro-active. It's far better to make gains than to have a defensive position to protect what we have. To sum all of this up (from my perspective), the next time the bobcat season is proposed we as trappers cannot afford any level of apathy. We need to be organized, we need to ask other sportsmen's groups for help, and we need to follow through. Like I said this is a wake-up call!
11 Comments
Jon Sorensen
8/31/2018 11:43:34 am
I for one wish i lived there to help you all out in getting a what sounds like a much needed season on this matter.
Reply
Mike Schuh
8/31/2018 12:39:08 pm
I feel for you's---In Wisconsin, It takes 7 plus years to get a Bobcat tag at 6 dollars a year. Its become a money thing for the DNR here. Even though there is a lot of Bobcats up here northern half of the state. Good luck
Reply
Joshua R. Blankenship
8/31/2018 01:32:01 pm
I completely agree that unfortunately with all these animal rights activists fighting against us. It's going to take someone getting hurt, we could manage them with a hunting season!!! I live in a rural part of West central Indiana, and have noticed a huge decline in the bob-white quail population. I believe that all of our small game animals have declined in numbers, and personally believe we've got a bobcat problem!!!
Reply
Mike Parrish
8/31/2018 02:03:15 pm
I was shocked when the Southern Counties in Indiana the bobcat season did not pass. I have trapped since I was 8-9 yrs old. I agree we need trappers to speak up and support each other. We don’t want to become a state that we let anti people to get a foothold in. When can the bobcat season be brought back up for vote?
Reply
Charlie Masheck
9/1/2018 10:43:18 am
Realistically sounds like it will be 4 years before we have a season, assuming the proposal goes through.
Reply
Eric Gourley
8/31/2018 02:36:25 pm
I think every time one of us Indiana Trappers has a bobcat on a trap we should call the local conservation officer and make them release them. That may give them a wake-up call when their officers are being tied up by releasing Bobcats instead of out trying to get poachers Etc. It will also help keep numbers for the state every time a conservation officer releases a bobcat.
Reply
Vince Weir
8/31/2018 11:16:51 pm
Eric you are spot on with that idea
Reply
Pablo q.
9/1/2018 07:05:34 am
*Even though, what they said was half truths at best and in most cases just plan "made up" rhetoric. "
Reply
David Delaney
9/1/2018 11:56:58 am
This is a matter of tactic. Waiting to influence and organize for 4 years is the wrong approach. Instead, organizations should have a progressive strategy to contact legislators each year expresding their thoughts. Legislator pressure can and will have profound influence. Additionally, farmers who might be experiencing some livestock loss can be a strong influence as well if they contact legislators.
Reply
Dave Hansen
12/24/2019 07:12:45 pm
Charlie, thanks for all that you are doing. I would like to say that we here in Ohio are trying to get a bobcat season. There was a proposal to have a season here a couple of years ago and it was going to be a quota type of deal. Not sure what happened but it went nowhere. I guess I need to do some investigating and see what has happened. Recently joined o.s.t.a. And am trying to get involved in some of the issues that involve trapping. We have a lot of cats in the southern part of the state and many sightings in the counties bordering Indiana. I heard of a coyote trapper in Jackson county who had to release 5 cats a couple of seasons ago. I promise I will do what I can to further this and I appreciate the work you are doing. I think a lot of what happens in Indiana affects us here in Ohio and vice versa.
Reply
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorCharlie Masheck has been a trapper since 1972. He started Hoosier Trapper Supply in 1976 and was a fur buyer from 1976 - 1991. Charlie is also the formulator of the Leatherwood Line of trapping scents, Top Dog Predator Bait and Lip Licker Deer Lure. His 46 years of trapping experience and association with trappers and the fur industry have given him a history and perspective of the trapping trade few have. Archives
August 2018
|